Transdermal Drug Delivery System of Antidiabetic Drugs: A Review
Swapnil T. Deshpande1*, P.
S. Vishwe1, Rohit D. Shah2, Swati S. Korabu2, Bhakti
R. Chorghe2, DG Baheti1
1SCSSS’s Sitabai Thite College of
Pharmacy, Shirur, Pune –
412 210
2Sinhgad
College of Pharmacy, Vadgaon (Bk.), Pune – 411 041
ABSTRACT:
Diabetes is chronic metabolic disorder,
resulting from insulin deficiency, characterized by hyperglycaemia,
altered metabolism of carbohydrate, protein and lipids and an increased risk of
vascular complication. The disadvantage of antidiabetic
drugs such as more frequent of administration, extensive first passes
metabolism and variable bioavailability, makes it is an ideal candidate for transdermal drug delivery systems. This article is
dedicated to the review of antihypertensive transdermal
patches in the perspective of enhancing the bioavailability as well as in
improving the patient compliance. The various antidiabetic
drugs sulfonylurea’s (SU), biguanides, meglitinide, thiazolidinediones (TZDs) Currently a number of antidiabetic transdermal patches
are introduced in to the pharmaceutical market. Most of the reported methods in
the literature employed solvent evaporation method or solvent casting method
for the preparation of transdermal patches. Depending
on the release required over a period of time, the concentrations of polymer,
plasticizer and penetrant were varied.
KEYWORDS: Antidiabetic drugs, Diabetes, Transdermal drug delivery systems, Transdermal
patches.
INTRODUCTION:
Transdermal system is the unique and new
drug delivery method applied through the skin. It provides for a prolonged and
uniform release of a drug [1]. These are device in the form of adhesive patches
of various shape and size (5-202) which deliver the contained drug
at a constant rate into systemic circulation via the stratum corneum (skin). The drug is held in reservoir between an
occlusive backing film and a rate controlling micropore
membrane the undersurface of which is smeared with an adhesive impregnated with
priming dose of the drug. The adhesive layer is protected by another film that
is to be peeled off just before application. The drug is delivered at the skin
surface by diffusion for percutaneous absorption into
circulation. The micropore membrane is such that rate
of drug delivery to the skin surface is less than that rate of drug delivery to
skin surface is less than the slowest rate of absorption from skin.tis offsets
any variation in the rate of absorption according to the properties of the different site [2].
Diabetes
is not a single disease entity but rather a group of metabolic disorders
sharing the common underlying feature of hyperglycaemia.
Hyperglycaemia in diabetes results from defect in
insulin secretion, insulin action, or, most commonly both. The chronic hyperglycaemia and attended metabolic deregulation may be
associated with secondary damage in multiple organ systems, especially the
kidneys, eyes, nerves, and blood vessels.
According
to the American diabetes association, diabetes affects over 20 million children
and adults, or 7% of the population, in the United States, nearly a third of
who are currently unwires that they have hyperglycaemia.
Approximately 1.5 million new cases of diabetes are diagnosed each year in the
united state and diabetes is the leading cause of end stage renal disease,
adult-onset blindness, and no traumatic lower extremity amputations. A
staggering 54 million adults in this country have “pre-diabetes”, which is
defined as elevated blood sugar that does not reach the criterion accepted for
an outright diagnosis to diabetes. The total no. of people with diabetes
worldwide was estimated to be between 151 million and 171 million at the turn
of the century, and is expected to rise 366 million by 2030. The prevalence of
diabetes is increasingly sharply in the developing world as people adopt more
sedentary life style, with India and China the largest contributors to the
world’s diabetic load [3]. Transdermal system is
ideally suited for diseases that demand chronic treatment [4]. In spite of the
high cost of transdermal patches for diabetes
treatment, antidiabetic patches with established
dosage forms reduced the occurrence of hospitalization and diagnostic costs.
Recently, different oral antidiabetic sulphonylurea drugs have been subjected to extensive
investigations for their appropriateness to be delivered via transdermal route e.g., glibenclamide,
chlorpropamide [5-7], gliquidone
[8] and glipizide [9, 10], and glimepiride
[11]. Glipizide is a potent, second generation oral sulphonylurea drug. Being a weak acid (pka=5.9),
glipizide is better absorbed from acidic medium;
however, at very low pH levels, the solubility of glipizide
is minimal [12]. This limited aqueous solubility causes large variations in
bioavailability and, in the presence of renal or hepatic insufficiency, alcohol
and other drugs, severe and prolonged hypoglycaemia
may occur [13]. Glimepiride is a new third generation
sulphonylurea oral hypoglycaemic
agent. It has been proposed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, whenever
blood glucose levels cannot be adequately controlled by diet, physical exercise
and weight reduction alone. Glimepiride enhances the
normal action of insulin on peripheral glucose uptake (insulin-sensitizing
effect). It also enhances peripheral glucose uptake and inhibits glucose output
(insulin-mimetic effects). It directly increases the number of glucose
transporters in the plasma membranes of muscle and fat cell. In comparison to
other sulphonylurea antidiabetic
drugs, glimepiride expresses an insulin-sparing
effect and minimal interaction with the cardiovascular system [14, 15]. This is
the various developed antidiabetic drug in the transdermal patch form. Currently a number of antidiabetic transdermal patches
are introduced into the pharmaceutical market. This article represents antidiabetic transdermal patches
as reported in various pharmaceutical journals.
Permeation through skin:
The
major problem associated with the dermal delivery system is the excellent
barrier property of the skin. This resides in the outermost layer, the stratum corneum. This unique membrane is only some 20 μm thick but has evolved to provide a layer that
prevents us from losing excessive amounts of water and limits the ingress of
chemicals with which we come into contact. The precise mechanisms by which
drugs permeate the stratum corneum are still under
debate but there is substantial evidence that the route of permeation is a
tortuous one following the intercellular channels. The diffusion path length is
between 300 and 500 μm rather than the 20 μm suggested by the thickness of the stratum corneum [16]. The intercellular channels contain a complex
milieu of lipids that are structured into ordered belayed arrays [17]. A
diffusing drug has to cross, sequentially, repeated bilayers
and therefore encounter a series of lipophilic and
hydrophilic domains. The physicochemical properties of permeant
are therefore crucial in dictating the overall rate of delivery [18]. A
molecule that is hydrophilic in nature will be held back by the lipophilic acyl chains of the
lipids and conversely, a lipophilic permeant will not penetrate well through the hydrophilic
head-group regions of the lipids.
Transdermal delivery system of antidiabetic
drug like glipizide has already been marketed. The impermeability of the skin has led to the
development of a number of enhancement strategies.
Antidiabetic drugs:
1.
Glipizide:
Glipizide is one of the most commonly prescribed drugs for treatment of
type 2 diabetes. Oral therapy with glipizide
comprises problems of bioavailability fluctuations and may be associated with
severe hypoglycaemia and gastric disturbances. As a
potential for convenient, safe and effective antidiabetic
therapy the rationale of this study was to develop a transdermal
delivery system for glipizide [10]. Glipizide is a potent, second generation oral sulphonylurea drug. Being a weak acid (pka=5.9),
glipizide is better absorbed from acidic medium;
however, at very low pH levels, the solubility of glipizide
is minimal [12]. Even though on the weight basis it is approximately 100 times
more potent then tolbutamide, the maximal hypoglycaemic effect of these two agents are similar. It is
rapidly absorbed on oral administration, with a serum half life of 2 to 4
hours, while the hypoglycaemia effect range from 12
to 24 hours [19].
Ammar HO et al. [10] formulated transdermal
formulation of the drug in carbopol base containing
20% propylene glycol together with 15% oleic acid and formulation containing glipizide - cyclodextrin complex
in presence of 15% urea showed best biological performance, as evidenced by: an
intensity of action comparable with the orally administered drug; a significant
increase in duration of action extending up to 48 h; a significant increase in
bioavailability as depicted from the values of the area under percentage decrease
in BGL versus time curve (AUC: 0-48h) which is significantly higher than that
of the orally administered drug.
2. Gliclazide:
Gliclazide, a second-generation hypoglycaemic
agent, faces problems like its poor solubility, poor oral bioavailability with
large individual variation and extensive metabolism. It is very similar to the tolbutamide with the
exception of the bio-cyclic heterocyclic ring found in gliclazide.
The pyrrolidine increases its lipophilicity
over that of tolbutamide, which increases its half
life even so the p-methyl is susceptible to the same oxidative metabolic fat as
observe for tolbutamide namely it will be metabolized
to carboxylic acid [19].
Kumar A et al. [3] formulated transdermal
matrix-type patches by film casting techniques on mercury using polymers like
HPMC, Eudragit RL-100, and chitosan.
Also an attempt was made to increase the permeation rate of drug by preparing
an inclusion complex with hydroxypropyl β-cyclodextrin (HP β-CD). The possibility of a
synergistic effect of chemical penetration enhancers (CPE) (propylene glycol
and oleic acid) on the transdermal transport of the
drug was also studied. Folding endurance was found to be high in patches
containing higher amount of the eudragit. There was
increase in tensile strength with an increase in eudragit
in the polymer blend. The patches containing inclusion complex of drug showed
higher permeation flux compared with patches containing plain drug.
3. Gliquidone:
Gliquidone, a second generation
sulfonylurea has been investigated for transdermal
delivery.
Sridevi S et
al. [8] studied that the poor aqueous solubility of the drug prompted the use
of hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin
(HP β-CD), a cyclic oligosaccharide, which is known to facilitate transdermal permeation of many drugs by enhancing the
solubility and thus improving the diffusible species of the drug molecules at
the skin-vehicle interface. In order to optimize the transdermal
delivery of gliquidone, the effect of pH along with complexation on the solubility and permeation has been
investigated. The solubility profiles of the drug, on increasing the
concentration of HP β-CD were of higuchi's AL
type at the three pH values evaluated. However, the solubilisation
slope of the drug at pH 7.0 was 22 times that at pH 3.0 as a result of greater
intrinsic solubility of the ionized form of the drug at pH 7.0. Transdermal flux of gliquidone at
pH 7.0 was significantly greater than the flux at pH 3.0 in the presence of 15%
w/v HP β-CD, attributable to the better solubility of the drug at pH 7.0
in the presence of HP β-CD. The effect of increasing concentrations of HP
β-CD investigated at variable drug loading in the donor phase at pH 7.4
endorsed the earlier observations from studies on other drugs that the drug has
to be present at saturation in HP β-CD aqueous vehicle to achieve an
optimized flux. While at saturation, the steady state flux of gliquidone from the aqueous HP β-CD (25% w/v) vehicle
was enhanced 31 times compared to pure drug suspension at pH 7.4, unsaturation in the donor phase resulted in the decreased
flux of gliquidone. It was concluded from the present
study that enhanced transdermal flux of gliquidone can be achieved by adjusting the pH and the
concentration of HP β-CD to achieve a better solubility of the drug.
4.
Glimepiride:
Glimepiride is a third generation oral antidiabetic sulphonylurea drug
frequently prescribed to patients of type 2 diabetes. Glimepiride
therapy improves postprandial insulin/C-peptide response, and overall glycaemia control. The problem arrived by the oral glimepiride therapy upon the bioavailability due to its
poor solubility leading to irreproducible clinical response, in addition to
adverse effects like dizziness and gastric disturbances. As a potential for
convenient, safe and effective antidiabetic therapy,
the transdermal delivery system for glimepiride was being developed.
Ammar HO et al. [11] formulated chitosan films for transdermal delivery of glimepiride. He used chitosan
due to its film forming ability, bioadhesive and
absorption enhancing properties. He formulated three formulations as chitosan films containing glimepiride,
the same formula in presence of a combination of 5% limonene together with 10%
ethanol and chitosan film comprising glimepiride - cyclodextrin
complex. In addition, a plain chitosan film of the
same size was also examined concurrently. The hypoglycaemic
effect of the selected formulations was assessed in diabetic rats and compared
to oral administration of the drug. The study revealed that the percent drug
released from the chitosan film comprising glimepiride and that comprising glimepiride
– cyclodextrin complex were adequate, reaching 39.68
± 1.73 and 61.50 ± 2.02 within 6 hours, respectively (mean ± S.E., n = 3). The
release rate values revealed that complexation of the
drug within cyclodextrin leads to significant
enhancement (p<0.005) of the release rate from 0.185 ± 0.007 (mg cm-2h-1)
to 0.242 ± 0.008 (mg cm-2 h-1).
Transdermal glimepiride will helped to maintain
good glycaemia control for relatively prolonged
period of time and, in turn, help to prevent long term complications.
5.
Glibenclamide [20]:
Glibenclamide is an anti-diabetic drug in a
class of medications known as sulfonylureas. It is
also sold in combination with metformin under the
trade name Glucovance.
Glibenclamide exerts pancreatic and extrapancreatic actions. It stimulates an increase in
insulin release by the pancreatic β-cells. It may also reduce hepatic gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis.
Increased glucose uptake in the liver and utilization in the skeletal muscles.
Sharma
A et al. [21] formulated matrix-type transdermal
patches in which the drug embedded in a polymeric matrix of polymethyl
methacrylate and ethyl cellulose was evaluated for
its hypoglycaemic activity in normal and streptozotocin induced diabetic rats in comparison with its
oral therapy.
6 Metformin:
Metformin hydrochloride, an oral
anti-diabetic drug frequently used as first line drug of choice in treatment of
type 2 diabetes, particularly in overweight and obese people and those with
normal kidney function [22]. Metformin is anti-hyperglycaemic and it does not cause insulin release in the
pancreas. Metformin reduces glucose levels primarily
by decreasing hepatic glucose production and by increasing insulin action in
muscle and fat. Metformin is absorbed mainly from the
small intestine and does not bind to plasma proteins [23].
Obstacle to more successful use of metformin hydrochloride therapy is the high incidence of
gastrointestinal side effects and rapid first pass metabolism. These problems
can be overcome by the preparation of transdermal
patches of metformin hydrochloride.
Allena RT et al. [24] developed a
sustained release transdermal patch of metformin hydrochloride using a natural polymer like chitosan and a hydrophilic polymer like HPMC. Release
kinetic studies revealed that the drug release from formulation followed zero
order kinetics with release exponent value n=0.966, which shows that release
pattern of patches follows non-fickian diffusion
mechanism. It was observed that the system with chitosan:
HPMC in the ratio 5:1 along with plasticiser was very
promising in controlling release of metformin via transdermal drug delivery system.
6.
Rosiglitazone:
Rosiglitazone maleate,
belonging to the class of thiazolidinedione, is an
oral anti-diabetic drug, which is particularly suitable for diabetic patients
who are overweight and for whom metformin is
contraindicated [25, 26]. It improves the glycaemia
control primarily by increasing peripheral insulin resistance and sensitizing
the skeletal muscle, liver and adipose tissue to the actions of insulin, in
addition to improving beta-cell function [27].
Ghosh B. et al. [28] delivered rosiglitazone maleate from
hydro-alcoholic vehicle of different composition and in vitro skin permeability
through full thickness ear skin of domestic pigs (Sus domesticus) was observed in a
Franz-diffusion cell using 0.9% NaCl as the receptor
fluid. For iontophoretic diffusion, a current density
of 0.5 mA/cm2 was used. Permeation rate of
rosiglitazone maleate had
increased with increase in donor drug concentration (p<0.01) up to the level
of 213.71 μmol/ml in both passive diffusion and iontophoresis resulting in good skin permeability.
CONCLUSION:
The brief overview of the different antidiabetic drugs revealed that, by delivering through the
transdermal route improves bioavailability as well
improve the patient compliance by many fold. But the demerit is that, all the antidiabetic drugs cannot be given as transdermal
delivery because the drug should have specific physicochemical property which
should be suited to permeate through skin. The development of success transdermal drug delivery system depends on proper
selection of drug, polymer as well as other additives
REFERENCES:
1. Barar FSK. Essentials of pharmacotherapeutics. Edn 4, S. Chand and company ltd., 2007, 9.
2. Tripathi KD. Essential of medical
pharmacology. Edn 6, Jaypee
brothers publication, 9.
3. Kumar V, Abul
KK, Nelson F. Aster J. Robin and cotran pathologic
basis of diseases, Edn 8, Professional edition, 2010,
1131.
4.
Jamakandi VG, Ghosh B,
Desai BG, Khanam J. Recent trends in transdermal cardiovascular therapy. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2006: 68 (5): 556-561
5.
Takahashi Y, Furuya K, Iwata M, Onishi H, Machida Y, Shirotake S.
Trial for transdermal administration of sulfonylureas. Yakugaku Zasshi, 1997;
117: 1022-1027.
6.
Takahashi Y, Iwata M, Machida Y. Enhancing effect of switching iontophoresis on transdermal
absorption of glibenclamide. Yakugaku Zasshi, 2001; 121 (2): 161-166.
7.
Mutalik S, Udupa N. Glibenclamide transdermal
patches: physicochemical, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic
evaluations. J. Pharm. Sci., 2004; 93 (6): 1577-1594.
8.
Sridevi S, Diwan PV.
Effect of pH and complexation on transdermal
permeation of gliquidone. Pharmazie, 2002; 57 (9): 632-634.
9.
Mutalik S, Udupa N.
Effect of some penetration enhancers on the permeation of glibenclamide
and glipizide through mouse skin. Pharmazie, 2002; 57 (12): 838-841.
10.
Ammar HO, Salama HA, Ghorab M, El-Nahhas S, Elmotasem H. A transdermal
delivery system for glipizide. Current Drug Deliv.,
2006; 3 (3): 333-341.
11.
Ammar HO, Salama HA, Ghorab M, El-Nahhas S, Elmotasem H. Design and
evaluation of chitosan films for transdermal
delivery of glimepiride. Current Drug Deliv., 2008;
5 (4): 290-298.
12.
Raymond GG, Born JL. An updated pKa listing of medicinal compounds. Drug Intell. Clin. Pharm., 1986; 20: 630-636.
13.
Baidya S, Biplab D, Samanta. A, Gupta BK. J. Inst. Chemists, 2001;
73: 91.
14.
Kabadi UM. Cost effective management of hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes using oral
agents. Manag. Care, 2004; 13 (7): 48-9.
15.
Kouichi I, Masaki W, Youhei
N, Takahiro S, Nobuki T, Masahiko T, Hideyuki K,
Kensuke Y, Masao S, Susumu K, Takuya A, Shigehiro K.
Effect of glimepiride in Japanese type 2 diabetes
subjects. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2005; 68 (3): 250-257.
16.
Holmgaard R, Bo Nielsen J. Dermal Absorption of Pesticides Evaluation of variability and
Prevention, The Danish Environmental Protection Agency, Danish, 2009.
17.
Cornwell PA, Barry BW, Stoddart CP, Bouwstra JA. Wide angle X-ray diffraction of human stratum corneum: effects of hydration and terpene
enhancer treatment. J Pharm Pharmacol, 1994; 46: 938–950.
18.
Flynn GL, Gerrity TR, Henry CJ. Principles of Route-to-Route Extrapolation
for Risk Assessment, New York: Elsevier; 1990. p. 93-127.
19.
Delgado JN, Gisvold O, Remers WA. Wilson and Gisvold’s
Text Book of Organic Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry. 2001. Edn 11, 670.
20.
Tripathi KD.
Essential of medical pharmacology. Edn 4, Jaypee brothers medical publishers, 278.
21.
Sharma A. Transdermal
approach of antidiabetic drug glibenclamide:
A Review. Int. J. Pharm. Res. Dev., 2011; 3 (11): 25-32.
22.
National Collaborating Centre for
Chronic Conditions. Type 2 diabetes: national clinical guideline for management
in primary and secondary care (update) London: Royal College of Physicians,
2008; ISBN 9781860163333: 86.
23.
Goodman LS, Brunton
LL, Goodman and Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. New York:
McGraw-Hill Medical; 2005. p. 1638-1639.
24.
Allena RT, Yadav HK, Sandina S, Prasad SC.
Preparation and evaluation of transdermal patches of metformin hydrochloride using natural polymer for sustained
release. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci., 2012; 4 (3): 297-302.
25.
Henry RR. Thiazolidinediones. Endocrinol. Metabol. Clin. North. Amer, 1997; 26:
553-573.
26.
Krentz AJ, Bailey CJ, Melande
A. Thiazolidinediones for type-2 diabetes. BMJ, 2000;
21: 252.
27.
Yardimci C, Zaltin NO.
Method development and validation for the simultaneous determination of rosiglitazone and metformin in
pharmaceutical preparations by capillary zone electrophoresis. Analytica. Chimica. Acta., 2005; 549: 88-95.
28.
Ghosh B, Rajgor N, Pallavi K, Patel J. Feasibility of rosiglitazone
for transdermal drug delivery. Int. J. Pharm. Res. Innov., 2011; 2: 23-31.
Received on 21.05.2013
Modified on 22.06.2013
Accepted on 10.08.2013
© A&V Publication all right reserved
Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Technology. 5(5):
September-October, 2013, 252-256